What divorce means for your green card, petition or naturalizationHow divorce affects immigration status
For people who obtained or are applying for U.S. status through marriage, divorce is not only a family and property matter; it can directly affect a green card, the removal of conditions and naturalization. The timing of the divorce, the wording of the divorce agreement and the evidence you keep will all affect later immigration filings. Conversely, U.S. citizens and green card holders who sponsored a spouse need to understand the obligations they still carry after divorce.
Immigration law is federal law, and the immigration rules below apply nationwide; divorce itself is governed by state law. The state-law parts of this page use Illinois as the example. For the overall marriage-based immigration process, see Marriage green cards.
At a glance: what stage are you at when you divorce?
| Stage at the time of divorce | General consequence | Possible paths |
|---|---|---|
| I-130 pending or approved, green card not yet obtained | The marriage-based I-130 loses its basis; if already approved, divorce before the beneficiary’s journey to the U.S. or before a decision on adjustment of status automatically revokes the approval (8 CFR 205.1) | Other family-based, employment-based or humanitarian paths; abused spouses may consider VAWA |
| I-485 adjustment of status pending | Once the underlying petition is revoked, the I-485 usually cannot be approved | Assess whether there is another basis for status; be aware of the risks once status is lost |
| Entered on a K-1 and married the petitioner, green card not yet obtained | A K-1 holder can adjust status only on the basis of the marriage to the original petitioner; under BIA precedent, divorce does not necessarily bar adjustment | May still adjust by proving the marriage was genuine (Matter of Sesay) |
| Holding a two-year conditional green card | Cannot file I-751 jointly with the former spouse | File I-751 alone and request a good-faith marriage or other waiver |
| Holding a ten-year green card | Divorce by itself does not affect permanent resident status | Apply for naturalization under the five-year rule |
| N-400 filed under the three-year rule, oath not yet taken | No longer meets the requirements of the three-year rule | Apply again once the five-year rule is met |
| A sponsor at any stage | The I-864 support obligation continues | The obligation ends only on the statutory events, and divorce is not one of them |
Conditional green cards: filing I-751 alone with a waiver after divorce
If a green card is obtained through marriage and the marriage is less than two years old on the day the green card is granted, the person receives two-year conditional permanent resident status and must file I-751 jointly with the spouse within the 90 days before it expires to remove the conditions. If a joint filing is not possible after divorce, the person can file I-751 alone and request a waiver of the joint filing requirement. The waiver grounds under section 216(c)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) include:
- Good-faith marriage that has ended: the marriage was entered into in good faith but has ended in divorce or annulment (the ground most commonly used after divorce);
- Abuse: the marriage was entered into in good faith, but during the marriage the applicant was battered by or subjected to extreme cruelty by the U.S. citizen or green card holder spouse;
- Extreme hardship: removal would result in extreme hardship.
Points to note:
- Filing time: A waiver filing does not have to wait for the 90-day window before expiration; under the USCIS Policy Manual, it can be filed before, during or after the window. If you are already in immigration court proceedings, it must be filed before a final order of removal.
- Divorce not yet final: Separation or a pending divorce case is not enough; the marriage must have ended with a final judgment. If you request a waiver on the ground that the marriage has ended but the divorce is not yet final when you file, USCIS will issue a request for evidence (RFE) asking for the final decree; if you still cannot show the divorce is final when you respond, the application will be denied. Plan the progress of the divorce case and the timing of the I-751 together.
- Divorce after a joint filing: If the marriage breaks down after a joint I-751 has been filed, you should inform USCIS. When you receive an RFE, submit the final divorce decree and request in writing that the joint filing be treated as a waiver, and USCIS will adjudicate it as a waiver. USCIS will not deny a joint petition solely because the spouses are separated or have started divorce proceedings.
- Focus of review: The review looks at whether the marriage was genuine when entered into, not why it ended. The evidence required is similar to a joint filing: shared residence, financial ties, photos and correspondence from life together, statements from family and friends, and so on. Gathering evidence after a divorce is often harder, so preserve it early.
See the I-751 guide.
Divorce while an I-130 / I-485 is pending
A marriage-based immigration application depends on the marriage continuing. Under 8 CFR 205.1(a)(3)(i)(D), approval of a petition filed by a U.S. citizen or green card holder for a spouse is automatically revoked when the marriage is legally terminated, if the beneficiary has not yet begun the journey to the U.S., or is applying for adjustment of status in the U.S. and no decision on the adjustment has yet been made. If the I-130 has not yet been approved, divorce likewise removes the basis for approval. As a result, an I-485 that depends on that I-130 usually cannot be approved.
- A work permit, advance parole and similar documents held while an I-485 is pending are based on the pending adjustment application; once the application is denied, those permissions are also affected, and there may be a gap in your status in the U.S.
- If you had another lawful status before filing the I-485 (for example, H-1B or F-1), assess whether that status is still valid, can be restored, or can be applied for again.
- If the divorce involves domestic violence or extreme cruelty by your spouse, consider a VAWA self-petition, discussed below.
- There are special rules if the petitioner dies; they are not covered in this section.
So if you are considering divorce while an I-130 or I-485 is pending, it is best to have a lawyer evaluate the consequences for your status and the alternative paths first, and then decide on the timing and manner of the divorce.
K-1 fiancé(e) visas
A person who enters on a K-1 visa must marry the K-1 petitioner within 90 days of entry and, under INA section 245(d), may adjust status only on the basis of the marriage to that petitioner, not through marriage to anyone else or any other path.
- Did not marry the petitioner after entry: Cannot adjust status in the U.S. and must depart within the K-1 period.
- Married within 90 days, divorced before adjusting: In Matter of Sesay, 25 I&N Dec. 431 (BIA 2011), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that a K-1 holder who entered into a bona fide marriage with the petitioner within 90 days may still be granted adjustment of status even if the marriage no longer exists when the adjustment is adjudicated; the person must still prove the marriage was genuine, show no grounds of inadmissibility, and merit a favorable exercise of discretion. The decision also held that if the bona fide marriage had already lasted two years at the time of adjudication, conditional resident status no longer applies. In practice, whether the documents needed for adjustment (such as the original petitioner’s affidavit of support) can be obtained is often the real obstacle and must be evaluated case by case.
Naturalization: the three-year rule no longer applies, so use the five-year rule
The spouse of a U.S. citizen can apply for naturalization under INA section 319(a) after holding a green card for three years; one of the requirements is being married to and living in marital union with the U.S. citizen spouse during those three years. Under the USCIS Policy Manual, living together is no longer required after the application is filed, but the applicant must remain the spouse of that U.S. citizen until taking the oath. If the divorce occurs before the oath, the applicant no longer meets the requirements of the three-year rule.
After divorce, you generally must apply under the five-year rule of INA section 316(a): a green card held for five years, continuous residence in the U.S., at least 30 months of physical presence, and so on. If you have already filed an N-400, discuss with a lawyer how to handle the pending application. Under USCIS policy, applicants who were battered by or subjected to extreme cruelty by a U.S. citizen spouse may be exempted from the “marital union” requirement, but must still meet the other requirements.
In addition, at the naturalization interview USCIS may ask about your marital history and the basis on which you obtained your green card. Divorce by itself does not show the original marriage was not genuine, but answering truthfully and having the relevant documents ready is important. See the N-400 guide and the naturalization guide.
The I-864 support obligation continues after divorce
A U.S. citizen or green card holder who signed an I-864 Affidavit of Support for a foreign spouse promised to maintain the sponsored immigrant’s income at 125% of the federal poverty guidelines during the sponsorship period. The obligation generally ends when the sponsored immigrant naturalizes, has worked 40 quarters in the U.S. (in some cases a spouse’s quarters can be credited), loses permanent resident status and departs the U.S., or either the sponsor or the sponsored immigrant dies. Divorce is not one of the terminating events.
- The sponsored immigrant can sue the sponsor directly under the I-864 to enforce the support obligation; government agencies that provide certain federal means-tested public benefits can also seek reimbursement from the sponsor.
- In Erler v. Erler (2016), the Ninth Circuit held that neither a divorce judgment nor a prenuptial agreement terminates the I-864 obligation, and that after the divorce and separation the calculation is based on a household of one (the sponsored immigrant).
- In Liu v. Mund (2012), the Seventh Circuit, which includes Illinois, held that the sponsored immigrant has no duty to seek employment to reduce the sponsor’s liability.
- Most published decisions hold that a clause in a divorce agreement in which the sponsored immigrant waives support does not automatically release the I-864 obligation either; decisions are not entirely consistent across jurisdictions.
So in divorce negotiations, both the sponsor and the sponsored immigrant should take the I-864 into account: the sponsor should assess the potential long-term liability, and the sponsored immigrant should understand his or her rights. How a divorce agreement addresses the I-864 is uncertain in effect and must be designed separately. For the relationship between prenuptial agreements and the I-864, see Prenuptial agreements.
Domestic violence or extreme cruelty: VAWA and other paths
A spouse of a U.S. citizen or green card holder who has been battered by or subjected to extreme cruelty by that spouse during the marriage can self-petition on Form I-360 under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), without the abusive spouse’s participation or knowledge. In general terms, the self-petitioner must show: a legal marriage to the abuser (or a terminated marriage that meets the statutory conditions), that the marriage was entered into in good faith, that the self-petitioner lived with the abuser, battery or extreme cruelty, and good moral character.
- If already divorced, the self-petition generally must be filed within two years of the divorce, and there must be a connection between the divorce and the battery or extreme cruelty.
- Conditional green card holders can also file I-751 alone with a waiver on the basis of abuse.
- Despite “women” in its name, VAWA applies equally to male victims.
The requirements and evidence for VAWA cases are complex and involve personal safety, so please consult a lawyer as early as possible; if you are in immediate danger, call 911 first.
Child custody and international travel
When a divorce involves children, arrangements for the children’s care and child support are decided by the state court according to the children’s best interests. Families that span countries should pay particular attention to children’s travel abroad:
- The Hague Convention: The United States is a party to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. According to the list of Convention partners published by the U.S. Department of State, within China the Convention applies only to Hong Kong and Macao, not to mainland China; Taiwan is not on the list either. Once a child is taken by a parent to a place that is not a Convention partner, getting the child back through legal channels is often very difficult.
- U.S. passports: Applying for a U.S. passport for a child under 16 generally requires both parents to apply together, or a notarized statement of consent from the parent who is not present, unless one parent has sole authority.
- Passport issuance alerts: The State Department’s Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program (CPIAP) can notify an enrolled parent when someone applies for a U.S. passport for a U.S. citizen child under 18. But it cannot stop a child from leaving on a foreign passport, and it cannot guarantee that an application will be intercepted.
- Relocation and travel restrictions: Illinois has specific rules on relocating with children after divorce (750 ILCS 5/609.2): a parent who has been allocated a majority or equal share of parenting time and wants to relocate generally must give the other parent written notice at least 60 days in advance and file it with the clerk of the court; if the other parent objects, the court decides. If you are worried that the other parent will take the children out of the U.S., you can ask the court to address international travel, custody of passports and similar matters in its judgment.
Immigration terms to consider in a divorce agreement
Beyond property and the children, a divorce agreement (marital settlement agreement) for an immigrant family can also address the following. Which terms are appropriate and enforceable depends on the spouses’ circumstances:
- Timing of the divorce: whether the date of the divorce judgment needs to be coordinated with the timeline for the I-751, naturalization or another immigration filing.
- I-751 evidence: an agreement that one spouse will cooperate by providing copies of documents that show the marriage was genuine, such as joint tax returns, leases and account records.
- I-864: a clear statement of both spouses’ understanding of the I-864 obligation, so that the agreement is not mistaken as automatically releasing it.
- Children’s travel and documents: custody of the children’s passports (including foreign passports), advance notice of and consent to international travel, and travel destinations and durations.
- Overseas property and documents: how property in China will be transferred, who is responsible for handling it, and what powers of attorney or statements the other spouse must provide.
- Text of the judgment: the divorce judgment will later be used in immigration filings and in China, so names (including pinyin and Chinese characters), dates and marriage information should be accurate and consistent; where needed, find out in advance what authentication is required for use in China.
How we can help
- Before you file for divorce, evaluate the effect on your green card, removal of conditions and naturalization, and plan the timeline;
- Prepare I-751 waiver applications based on divorce, abuse or extreme hardship, and prepare for RFEs and interviews;
- Evaluate paths that do not depend on your spouse, such as a VAWA self-petition;
- Advise sponsors or sponsored immigrants on the I-864 obligation;
- In Illinois (and New York and Massachusetts) divorces, write immigration terms into the divorce agreement and communicate with your divorce lawyer (if you have a separate one).
Frequently asked questions
Will my green card be canceled after divorce?
If you hold a ten-year green card, divorce by itself does not affect your permanent resident status. If you hold a two-year conditional green card, you remove the conditions by filing I-751 alone with a waiver, and the review looks at whether the marriage was genuine when entered into. If you do not yet have a green card and an I-130 or I-485 is still pending, divorce usually means the marriage-based application cannot proceed.
My divorce is not final yet, and my I-751 deadline is approaching. What should I do?
You can consider requesting a waiver on another ground (such as abuse or extreme hardship), or filing first and then submitting the final divorce decree after you receive an RFE. Which approach fits depends on the progress of the divorce case and your evidence; we recommend planning with a lawyer early, and do not let your conditional green card expire without filing.
I already filed for naturalization under the three-year rule, and now I am divorced. What should I do?
The three-year rule requires you to remain married to your U.S. citizen spouse until the oath. After divorce, you generally no longer qualify under that rule and must wait until you meet the five-year rule to apply. Discuss with a lawyer how to handle the pending application, and explain the change in your marriage truthfully at the interview.
I signed an I-864 for my ex-wife. Am I still responsible after the divorce?
Yes. Divorce does not end the I-864 obligation. The obligation generally ends when the sponsored immigrant naturalizes, has worked 40 quarters, loses permanent resident status and departs the U.S., or either party dies. Take this potential liability into account in divorce negotiations.
I entered on a K-1, married, and divorced soon afterward. Can I still get a green card?
Possibly. Under the BIA’s decision in Matter of Sesay, a person who entered into a bona fide marriage with the K-1 petitioner within 90 days may still adjust status even after a later divorce, but must prove the marriage was genuine and resolve document issues such as the affidavit of support. This must be evaluated case by case.
I am worried the other parent will take our child back to China. What can I do?
Mainland China is not a U.S. partner under the Hague Child Abduction Convention, so once a child is taken there it is very hard to get the child back through the Convention. You can ask the court to restrict international travel and address custody of passports in the divorce or parenting judgment, and enroll in the State Department’s Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program. In an emergency, contact a lawyer and law enforcement immediately.
Official sources
- USCIS: Removing conditions on permanent residence based on marriage (including waivers)
- 8 CFR 205.1: Automatic revocation of petition approvals
- USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 12, Part G, Chapter 3: Spouses of U.S. citizens residing in the United States
- Matter of Sesay, 25 I&N Dec. 431 (BIA 2011)
- U.S. Department of State: Hague Abduction Convention partner countries and areas
- U.S. Department of State: Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program (CPIAP)
Related reading
- I-751 guide
- I-864 Affidavit of Support explained
- N-400 naturalization application explained
- Marriage green cards
- Divorce and property division in Illinois
In the middle of a marriage-based green card case or holding a conditional green card, and considering divorce? Or worried about I-864 liability after divorce, or about your children being taken abroad? Book an attorney consultation, or call (312) 519-1115. David Wang will first check the stage and timeline of your immigration case, and then explain the immigration consequences of divorce and the paths available. We do not guarantee the outcome of any application.
This page is general information, not legal advice. Family and estate matters are governed by state law, the rules differ from state to state, and outcomes depend on the specific facts. Our firm advises on Illinois, New York and Massachusetts law; matters involving other countries require coordination with local counsel.